Summary Statistics

graphBelow are statistics for individual club members including club rank (by piece, and by gold-silver-bronze), club rating, the total number of games used for rating purposes (against members and non-members), win rate, average rating of opponents, and results (win, draw, loss) by colour and overall. (Only members with games in the last 90 days are shown. Total games rated since Jan 1 2013 = 10662, Statistics updated 16/09/2026)

(An explanation of how ratings are calculated can be found here. Detailed individual player results for games between financial members can be found here. Only financial member ratings are displayed. Note these are not NZCF or FIDE ratings.)



Result
Rank Name Rating Games Win Rate Average Opponent Rating As White As Black Overall
gking Nathan Sun 1679 134 0.81 1543 +52=3-12 +57=5-5 +109=8-17
sking Anyi Wang 1628 69 0.68 1542 +22=2-11 +25=2-7 +47=4-18
bking Dundun Zhang 1609 210 0.57 1532 +60=3-42 +59=4-42 +119=7-84
gqueen Felix Zuo 1600 46 0.74 1554 +17=2-5 +17=1-4 +34=3-9
squeen Andy Shi 1597 82 0.60 1534 +25=5-10 +24=6-12 +49=11-22
bqueen Paul Dalley 1587 244 0.57 1544 +76=4-42 +64=7-51 +140=11-93
grook Bruce Wang 1575 101 0.53 1534 +24=6-17 +30=4-20 +54=10-37
srook Edwin Zhou 1568 100 0.52 1539 +28=5-19 +24=4-20 +52=9-39
brook Austin John 1562 170 0.47 1524 +37=12-32 +43=10-36 +80=22-68
gbishop Ian Kennedy 1546 1063 0.50 1539 +276=33-209 +258=38-249 +534=71-458
sbishop Cal Comin 1541 45 0.49 1513 +13=2-9 +9=1-11 +22=3-20
bbishop Stephan Petrov 1540 69 0.43 1521 +17=0-17 +13=3-19 +30=3-36
gknight John Feyter 1527 142 0.48 1522 +36=4-30 +32=3-37 +68=7-67
sknight Vihaan Prem 1526 14 0.50 1540 +1=0-5 +6=0-2 +7=0-7
bknight Archie Verry 1517 28 0.39 1513 +6=0-8 +5=0-9 +11=0-17
gpawn Richard Jackson 1511 1033 0.49 1538 +255=30-230 +253=25-240 +508=55-470
spawn Athul Kaimal 1503 99 0.32 1506 +19=5-27 +13=5-30 +32=10-57
bpawn Daksha Dinesh 1479 96 0.36 1514 +17=1-29 +18=0-31 +35=1-60
wpawn Andrew Evelo 1461 11 0.36 1495 +2=0-5 +2=0-2 +4=0-7
wpawn David Morse 1454 35 0.40 1509 +7=1-9 +7=1-10 +14=2-19
wpawn Yuanwei Zhao 1443 149 0.25 1512 +23=11-42 +14=10-49 +37=21-91
wpawn Carlos Duan 1441 163 0.18 1501 +17=11-56 +13=8-58 +30=19-114
wpawn Gerard Classens 1421 17 0.18 1493 +0=0-8 +3=0-6 +3=0-14
wpawn William Hu 1418 46 0.17 1496 +4=3-17 +4=2-16 +8=5-33
wpawn Ray Zhang 1399 42 0.12 1508 +3=0-21 +2=1-15 +5=1-36




The following table shows the maximum rating recorded by individual players, and the date on which the rating was achieved

  Maximum Rating Achieved Date
Nathan Sun 1686 8/09/2026
Paul Dalley 1643 25/11/2025
Felix Zuo 1642 28/07/2026
Anyi Wang 1628 25/08/2026
Dundun Zhang 1617 28/07/2026
Bruce Wang 1611 28/10/2025
Richard Jackson 1602 17/11/2015
Ian Kennedy 1598 25/08/2026
Andy Shi 1597 17/02/2026
Edwin Zhou 1587 28/10/2025
Austin John 1575 11/11/2025
Cal Comin 1571 25/08/2026
John Feyter 1564 21/04/2026
Vihaan Prem 1554 8/09/2026
Daksha Dinesh 1547 7/10/2025
Stephan Petrov 1540 15/09/2026
David Morse 1536 5/08/2026
Archie Verry 1522 5/08/2026
Athul Kaimal 1519 2/06/2026
William Hu 1516 21/04/2026
Yuanwei Zhao 1514 7/10/2025
Andrew Evelo 1507 5/08/2026
Gerard Classens 1494 28/07/2026
Carlos Duan 1476 15/10/2024
Ray Zhang 1475 3/02/2026
Comments
  1. Rowan's avatar Rowan says:

    Hi Ian just wondering why RIchard has the most points yet is not first in the club ladder but is in the summary stats. Thanks

    • Ian's avatar Ian says:

      On the ladder page you can read how the ladder works, Even if the clubs weakest player beats the player on the top of the ladder then they become top and so on.

      • Richard Dare's avatar Richard Dare says:

        I did not lose to Alex Treat i had a draw with him while playing white according to the Ladder if you lose to someone or draw with someone while playing white who was ranked lower than you in the ladder you swap places i understand the losing part but not the drawing part lol just because your playing white against a lower ranked player does not give you a decisive advantage also the issue i have with the ladder is you can be first for the ladder and never play in the club again and no one can ever take away your spot as no one can beat you as your not coming to tournaments as long as you keep playing the yearly chess club fee you will be first for the ladder forever. A more fair ladder would be biased on points you make so your ranking is biased on your points not on the latest game you played and to make it fair for people who have not been playing for long in the club every year the club ladder can reset so for every night of the chess club you tally up the points of each player add it to their total for the club ladder so you can see more accurately how players are doing per week i would happily record all the data of the results of all players on the tuesday night sort out all the points together and put players in order biased on points (if tie in points put them in alphabetical order) and send all the information to Ian so all he would have to do is copy and paste it on to the site the best thing about this potential new ladder is that no one can just not show up and be first forever as every night you do not show up others can overtake you as they will be gaining points and you won’t be by not showing up that my opinion feel free to reply i am open to suggestions. 🙂

  2. Richard Dare's avatar Richard Dare says:

    Hi Ian Kennedy how come my rating has dropped 6 points from last week despite me winning all my last 3 games?

    • Ian's avatar Ian says:

      in the last set I had entered the summer cup twice, so the 1690 was wrong. Still a way to go to 1700 sorry

Leave a comment